Packaging

Sustainable Packaging Best Practices

Most packaging sustainability advice is about materials. The bigger win is usually size — and it's the one that also saves money.

Start with size, not material

Before choosing a greener material, use less of it. Oversized boxes are the dominant failure mode in e-commerce packaging, and they're expensive in four directions at once:

Right-sizing is the rare intervention where the environmental case and the cost case point the same way. Practical moves: keep a wider range of box sizes rather than defaulting to three, use mailers instead of boxes for non-fragile flat goods, and check cube utilisation — if a typical parcel is more than about a third air, there's money on the floor.

The blunt test

Open a shipment and ask what fraction of the volume is product. If the honest answer is "about half," the packaging problem is size, and no amount of compostable void fill will fix it.

Materials, ranked by what actually happens to them

The useful question isn't "is this recyclable in principle" but "will this be recycled where the recipient lives."

Corrugated cardboard and paper — the safe default

Cardboard is accepted in essentially every curbside programme, has genuinely high recycling rates, and carries meaningful recycled content already. Paper-based void fill, paper tape and paper mailers keep the whole parcel in one material stream, which means the recipient can put the entire thing in one bin without disassembling anything.

Plastic film — recyclable, but rarely recycled

Poly mailers, bubble wrap and air pillows are technically recyclable but almost never accepted curbside. They require store drop-off programmes, and participation is low. Worse, film in a curbside stream tangles sorting machinery and contaminates other materials.

Film does have a real advantage: it's light, which cuts transport emissions. For a large, lightweight, non-fragile item the honest answer is genuinely contested. But if the recipient can't easily recycle it, count it as waste in your assessment.

Mixed and laminated materials — the worst outcome

Padded mailers that combine paper outers with plastic bubble linings are the classic trap. They look paper-based, get put in the paper bin, and contaminate it. Anything that can't be separated by hand in a few seconds will end up in the wrong stream. Mono-material beats clever composites almost every time.

Compostable and bio-based — read the fine print

"Compostable" usually means industrially compostable: sustained high temperatures that a garden heap doesn't reach. If the recipient lacks access to industrial composting — most people do — it goes to landfill, where it may perform no better than conventional plastic. It also contaminates plastic recycling if mistakenly sorted there.

"Bio-based" describes what a material is made from, not how it breaks down. Bio-based plastics can be chemically identical to fossil-derived ones and just as persistent. Treat the two words as unrelated.

Design rules worth following

The regulatory direction of travel

This area is moving quickly, and the direction is consistent: the cost of packaging waste is being shifted onto the companies that create it.

If you sell physical goods across markets, packaging decisions made now will be assessed against these rules for years. Designing for recyclability early is cheaper than retrofitting under a fee schedule.

Making claims safely

Be specific and verifiable. "Box is 100% recycled corrugate, recyclable curbside" is defensible. "Sustainable packaging" is not a claim — it's an invitation for a regulator to ask what you mean.

Where delivery choices matter more than packaging

Packaging is visible, so it absorbs most of the attention. But for many shipments the transport decisions dominate the footprint:

For the person receiving the parcels